Baréin / Casos nacionales
Encrypted satellite rebroadcast prosecution
Casos nacionales. La inclusión en esta ficha no convierte una referencia extranjera en una decisión nacional. Se conserva el estado y el alcance de la fuente.
Expediente y fuentes
- Nombre
- Encrypted satellite rebroadcast prosecution
- Cita
- Court of Cassation, Criminal Appeal 26/2006, rule 69
- Tribunal
- Court of Cassation, Criminal Circuit
- Instancia
- court_of_cassation
- Fechas
- Decisión
- 2006-12-11
- Estado
- cassation_quashed_and_remanded
- Resultado
- Conviction quashed and matter remanded.
- Resumen
- No. The judgment did not identify any protected work or author under the 1993 decree, preventing legal review of whether the charged conduct fell within copyright protection.
- Antecedentes
- Defendants were prosecuted in case 07/2005/7816/8 for receiving and rebroadcasting encrypted satellite channels without right-holder consent. Trial imposed imprisonment, confiscation and deportation; appeals 2111/2005 and 2112/2005 resulted on 2006-01-29 in a three-month sentence for the appellant and removal of the co-defendant's deportation.
- Historia procesal
- Defendants were prosecuted in case 07/2005/7816/8 for receiving and rebroadcasting encrypted satellite channels without right-holder consent. Trial imposed imprisonment, confiscation and deportation; appeals 2111/2005 and 2112/2005 resulted on 2006-01-29 in a three-month sentence for the appellant and removal of the co-defendant's deportation.
- Cuestión jurídica
- Whether a copyright conviction could stand without identifying the protected works and authors allegedly infringed.
- Criterio
- No. The judgment did not identify any protected work or author under the 1993 decree, preventing legal review of whether the charged conduct fell within copyright protection.
- Fundamento decisivo
- A court must identify the protected subject matter and right-holder connection; a generic reference to channels or programming is insufficient for review.
- Límites
- Applied the 1993 decree; concerns pleading/proof in infringement, not GenAI authorship.
- Relevancia
- autoria-output
- Referencias relacionadas
- Peso del precedente
- binding_or_highly_authoritative_national_cassation_on_identification_gate Integración/votación: Khalifa bin Rashid bin Abdullah Al Khalifa; Masaad Ramadan Al-Saai; Mohsen Mohamed Fadli; Mohieddin Al-Sayed Hassan panel disposition; no dissent recorded
- Fuente
- Referencia
- Encrypted satellite rebroadcast prosecution
- Enlace
- Consultar fuente
- Autoridad
- Court of Cassation, Criminal Circuit
- Tipo
- doctrina-general
- Tipo de evidencia
- complete_primary_judicial_file
- Localizador
- official text, rule 69; lines 14-38, 45-95
- Verificación documentada
- Sí