Bolivia / Doctrina supranacional
TJCA 292-IP-2021
Doctrina supranacional. La inclusión en esta ficha no convierte una referencia extranjera en una decisión nacional. Se conserva el estado y el alcance de la fuente.
Expediente y fuentes
- Nombre
- TJCA 292-IP-2021
- Cita
- TJCA 292-IP-2021
- Tribunal
- Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina
- Instancia
- tribunal supranacional
- Fechas
- Decisión
- 2024-07-10
- Estado
- resuelto-firmeza-no-verificada
- Resultado
- Interpretation consigned; national court must apply it and determine facts. No national winner or remedy is supplied.
- Resumen
- Protection of a compilation lies in original selection or disposition, not in underlying content. A merely chronological judicial compilation may lack creativity; synthesis, summaries, presentation, correlation or disagreement can be creative. Registration is declarative and rebuttable.
- Antecedentes
- BDP challenged SENAPI-related protection of literary works registered to Jaime Guillermo Dunn de Ávila, disputing compilation originality, registration effects and employment attribution.
- Historia procesal
- The interpretation was requested in Bolivian national process 257/2019, originating in file 17/2016. The later national disposition was not located.
- Cuestión jurídica
- Originality of compilations; author/title; declarative registration.
- Criterio
- Protection of a compilation lies in original selection or disposition, not in underlying content. A merely chronological judicial compilation may lack creativity; synthesis, summaries, presentation, correlation or disagreement can be creative. Registration is declarative and rebuttable.
- Fundamento decisivo
- A compilation protects only original selection or disposition; chronology alone may fail, while synthesis, summaries, presentation or correlation may embody creativity. Registration is declarative and rebuttable.
- Límites
- No national outcome, GenAI issue or machine-authorship holding; employee attribution and originality remained fact dependent.
- Relevancia
- administrativo
- Referencias relacionadas
- Peso del precedente
- Binding Andean interpretive authority for the referring Bolivian proceeding, not a national merits decision. Integración/votación: Approved in Acta 14-J-TJCA-2024 and signed by participating magistrates Sandra Catalina Charris Rebellón, Rogelio Mayta Mayta and Íñigo Salvador Crespo; no vote breakdown or dissent published.
- Fuente
- Referencia
- TJCA 292-IP-2021
- Enlace
- Consultar fuente
- Autoridad
- Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina
- Tipo
- supranational preliminary interpretation requested by a Bolivian court; non-GenAI
- Localizador
- §§1.1–1.12, answers 2.1–2.3, decision and signatures
- Verificación documentada
- Sí