Thailand / Casos nacionales
Supreme Court Judgment 1265/2563 — Nakhon Si Thammarat city-gate design
Casos nacionales. La inclusión en esta ficha no convierte una referencia extranjera en una decisión nacional. Se conserva el estado y el alcance de la fuente.
Expediente y fuentes
- Nombre
- Supreme Court Judgment 1265/2563 — Nakhon Si Thammarat city-gate design
- Cita
- ฎีกา 1265/2563; Supreme Court docket ทก.(ป)2/2562
- Tribunal
- Supreme Court of Thailand, Intellectual Property division
- Instancia
- última instancia
- Fechas
- year
- 2020
- Estado
- year-only-reporter
- Resultado
- Trial dismissal modified; municipality ordered to pay THB 200,000 plus interest and costs.
- Resumen
- The design was the claimant's original painting/design despite known elements and requested revisions because he independently selected, drew, arranged and exercised judgment over the expression.
- Antecedentes
- A shopowner/designer researched city history and vernacular architecture, selected five monuments, chose perspectives, lines and scale, arranged Thai motifs, flowers and zodiac elements, and revised the city-gate drawings following municipal feedback. The municipality later tendered and built three gates using the design.
- Historia procesal
- The designer filed a civil action. The Central IP and International Trade Court dismissed. On direct appeal the Supreme Court reversed as to the municipality and awarded THB 200,000 plus interest and costs.
- Cuestión jurídica
- Whether selection and arrangement of known local elements, including revisions requested by a commissioner, left sufficient originating human expression and authorship.
- Criterio
- The design was the claimant's original painting/design despite known elements and requested revisions because he independently selected, drew, arranged and exercised judgment over the expression.
- Fundamento decisivo
- External instructions or feedback do not displace authorship where a person remains responsible for the particular expressive selection and execution.
- Límites
- This is strong evidence of detailed human authorship, not a rule that a prompt-user always authors an AI output. The court did not address unpredictable model expression or whether prompt constraints are embodied in the output.
- Relevancia
- autoria-asistida
- Referencias relacionadas
- Peso del precedente
- Final Supreme Court authority with high guiding weight on human choices, feedback and execution. Integración/votación: Three-judge panel: Sophon Bangyikhan, Niphan Chuaysakun and Chalit Kathinasamit (Thai transliteration); individual votes/separate opinions not published.
- Fuente
- Referencia
- Supreme Court Judgment 1265/2563 — Nakhon Si Thammarat city-gate design
- Enlace
- Consultar fuente
- Autoridad
- ThaiDeka reproduction identifying source as the Office/Division of Supreme Court Judicial Assistants
- Tipo
- national human-choice and revision analogue; not an AI case
- Localizador
- ThaiDeka case-analysis issue/result plus เนื้อหาคำพิพากษา on the five monuments, perspectives, line/scale/arrangement and revisions; final disposition; ข้อมูลฎีกา docket/coram/source
- Verificación documentada
- Sí