Tunisia / Casos nacionales

Société tunisienne de l'édition v. Mohamed Karrou and Société tunisienne de diffusion

Casos nacionales. La inclusión en esta ficha no convierte una referencia extranjera en una decisión nacional. Se conserva el estado y el alcance de la fuente.

Expediente y fuentes

Nombre
Société tunisienne de l'édition v. Mohamed Karrou and Société tunisienne de diffusion
Cita
Tribunal de première instance de Tunis, affaire n° 4006, jugement inédit du 29 décembre 1975
Tribunal
Tribunal de première instance de Tunis
Instancia
first-instance civil court
Fechas
Decisión
1975-12-29
Estado
unpublished judgment; detailed institutional report by WIPO
Resultado
All requested destruction, payment and moral-damage claims were dismissed.
Resumen
The research and verification were not an original personal creation and created no copyright; the contractual bases also failed.
Antecedentes
The publishing company claimed contracts with the heirs of poet Abou Kacem Echebbi concerning the collection Les Chansons de la vie. It asserted that verifying the complete original poem text and researching poem dates and circumstances conferred copyright. Mohamed Karrou's Abou Kacem Echebbi, sa vie, ses poèmes, published by the Société tunisienne de diffusion, contained most poems in the claimed collection.
Historia procesal
The publisher sought destruction of all copies, the value of all printed copies and 5,000 dinars for moral harm. The first-instance court rejected the claims. The judgment was unpublished; the located WIPO report identifies docket and date but no appeal.
Cuestión jurídica
Whether textual verification and research into dates and circumstances of pre-existing poems constituted an original and personal creation capable of copyright, and whether the claimed publishing contracts were opposable.
Criterio
The research and verification were not an original personal creation and created no copyright; the contractual bases also failed.
Fundamento decisivo
Labor, verification and factual research, without original personal expression, do not themselves generate copyright.
Límites
First-instance, unpublished, under the repealed 1966 Act; the report is an institutional secondary account rather than a primary judgment image; much of the disposition also rested on contract formalities.
Relevancia
doctrina-general
Referencias relacionadas
    Peso del precedente
    Persuasive national first-instance analogy only, weakened by repeal of the governing Act and absence of the primary judgment text. Integración/votación: Coram, individual judge names and voting information were not published; the decision is identified as an unpublished first-instance judgment.
    Fuente
    Referencia
    Société tunisienne de l'édition v. Mohamed Karrou and Société tunisienne de diffusion
    Enlace
    Consultar fuente
    Autoridad
    World Intellectual Property Organization
    Tipo
    WIPO institutional case report; primary judgment unpublished
    Fecha de comprobación
    2026-08-30
    Localizador
    Le Droit d'auteur, June 1984, printed p 262; PDF p 23; docket corroboration in April 1988, printed p 248, footnote 29
    Verificación documentada
    Volver a Tunisia